- Passing the baton: will Borrell buck the anti-rights trend?
I watched on as EU High Representative Federica Mogherini and Vitalina Koval, an LGBTI rights activist from Ukraine, shook hands. Two strong women with much in common; not least that they have both faced and pushed back against gendered abuse for being in the public eye.
This extraordinary meeting took place in August at the Gymnich meeting of EU Foreign Ministers in Helsinki. For what could be for the first time ever, foreign ministers sat at the same table with women human rights defenders from across the globe. The women facing smear campaigns, threats and violence were able to tell officials face to face what they need the EU to do to better protect them.
This visible, innovative, high level meeting represented the epitome of what the European Union’s human rights defender policy can be, and we hope will be under the new High Representative. The handshake publicly demonstrated EU support for Vitalina and showed those who attack her in Ukraine that, right up to the highest political level, the EU will not let these actions pass with impunity.
It was an extraordinary meeting, but unfortunately also a rare one.
A report published by Amnesty International today found that the EU’s commitment to protect and support human rights defenders like Vitalina in its foreign policy is not consistently upheld, not between nor even within countries. The report looks at EU action for human rights defenders in Burundi, China, Honduras, Russia and Saudi Arabia, drawing on discussions with defenders and EU diplomats alike.
This is especially problematic now, because human rights are currently facing pushback from governments around the world. Human rights defenders are at the frontlines of that pushback, facing spiralling crackdowns of attacks, restrictive laws, smear campaigns and surveillance. Vitalina Koval herself was attacked at a protest on International Women’s Day in March 2018, where she was doused with red paint causing chemical burns in her eyes. The same attackers later took to social media to threaten her and other activists with further violence, and two activists were followed to their homes and beaten up.
Activists in all of the countries we examined testified to the difference that EU support can make to their work and lives in the face of repression. But their testimonies also reveal how a lack of strategy and glaring inconsistencies in EU human rights policy can often undermine action to support defenders.
Increasing restrictions suffocating civil society in Saudi Arabia have not been met with a clear response from the EU which rarely, if ever, speaks out publicly in defence of the country’s activists. Meanwhile, despite complex relations with China, the EU uses much more public diplomacy to raise the cases of human rights defenders facing harassment, arbitrary detention and torture.
When Mohammad al-Otaibi, a human rights defender from Saudi Arabia was forcibly deported from Qatar despite having been granted a humanitarian visa by Norway, the EU and its member states failed to speak out in his defense and he was exposed to further injustice.
Our report did identify many good and even innovative ways in which the EU supports human rights defenders, for example by crowdfunding for training on digital security or using targeted social media to counter smear campaigns.
In an example of the impact that EU action can have, when prominent Russian human rights defenders Oyub Titiev and Valentina Cherevatenko faced unfounded prosecution, consistent, high-level and coordinated EU action contributed to the authorities’ decision to reduce the charges against Titiev and even drop those against Cherevatenko.
But under the new High Representative, these positive actions must be integrated into a strategy and consistently undertaken, rather than happening on an ad-hoc basis. The EU and its member states need to set out a clear vision of how to defend defenders, by delivering on their human rights commitments across all aspects of the EU’s external action.
This should be backed up with results-oriented country-level action plans, global public communications strategies on how the EU raises the cases of individual defenders and efforts to join up various human rights policies on women’s, LGBTI and Indigenous Peoples’ rights. All of these initiatives must take their lead from people defending rights on the ground.
We look forward to seeing the new High Representative bringing action for defenders squarely into a coherent and united EU foreign policy in the coming years – and EU diplomats actively defending defenders in their daily work in EU delegations, as much as at summits and high-level visits.
We need EU Foreign Ministers to affirm their commitment to promote and protect human rights defenders through Foreign Affairs Council Conclusions, giving crucial political backing at highest level to deliver robustly on EU commitments to defenders.
Very often, we have seen the EU champion human rights – even if it is currently punching below its weight for defenders at risk.
Yet that extraordinary handshake in Helsinki shows us how much more is still possible when defenders on the ground are empowered by those in the corridors of power.
by Eve Geddie, Director, EU Office, Amnesty International
- Left adrift in the Mediterranean
“The most important thing for these people here is that they get to a safe port and be allowed to get off the boat,” said Richard Gere, speaking from the Proactiva Open Arms NGO rescue ship today. The Hollywood star had come to Lampedusa in southern Italy to help raise awareness of the plight of 121 asylum seekers who have now been at sea for eight days. On board are more than 30 children, among them two babies, but Italian and Maltese authorities are refusing to let them disembark.
The most important thing for these people here is that they get to a safe port and be allowed to get off the boat
Many of those on board are reportedly suffering injuries including third degree burns and gunshot wounds inflicted during their detention in Libya, from which they recently fled. At least one man claims to have sustained injuries during last month’s attack on Tajoura detention centre in Tripoli. Yet, despite searing temperatures and mounting concerns for their well-being, Italian and Maltese authorities will not allow them to disembark.
Source and further information:
- 121 people including babies and children stranded at sea in searing heat must be allowed to dock
More than 30 children, including two babies, and nearly 90 men and women stranded at sea in searing temperatures, must be immediately allowed to dock, said Amnesty International, as the stand-off between the Italian, Maltese and Spanish authorities and a NGO rescue ship enters its second week.
Despite mounting concerns for their well-being, Italian and Maltese authorities are refusing a port where they could safely be disembarked. Spanish authorities have yet to formally request help from European institutions to mediate a solution.
After a week stranded at sea in blistering heat, these women, men and children should be immediately disembarked either in Malta or Italy
“After a week stranded at sea in blistering heat, these women, men and children who have risked their lives to escape human rights abuses in Libya should be immediately disembarked either in Malta or Italy,” said Maria Serrano, Amnesty International’s Senior Researcher on Migration.
Source and further information: